September 17, 2026

Validating in a SaaS World

Validating in a SaaS World: Why GAMP 5 Matters for Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central

Cloud ERP has transformed the way regulated businesses manage their operations. With Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, organisations can benefit from a modern SaaS platform that receives continuous updates, security improvements, and new capabilities.

But for pharmaceutical and other regulated businesses, moving to the cloud does not remove the need for validation. Instead, it changes how validation needs to be managed.

Validating in a SaaS World

Plenty of Business Central partners can customise the platform. Not all have the capability to validate what they have built.

In a SaaS environment, that distinction matters more than ever. Microsoft manages the underlying Business Central platform and its associated security and compliance controls, including certifications such as SOC 2 and ISO 27001. However, these controls do not automatically cover your organisation’s specific configurations or custom code.

Your configurations, extensions, workflows, integrations, and bespoke logic remain part of your validation responsibility. Every change needs to be considered in the context of your intended use, critical business processes, data integrity, and regulatory requirements.

Continuous SaaS updates add another layer to the challenge. Validation cannot simply be a one-time activity completed during implementation. As the platform evolves, businesses need an approach that keeps validation aligned with relevant system changes.

Who Is Responsible for Validation in a SaaS Environment?

Microsoft is responsible for the underlying cloud platform and infrastructure. This includes the platform-level security, availability, and compliance controls provided as part of the SaaS service.

However, the responsibility for how your organisation configures and uses Business Central remains with your business and implementation team.

This means organisations need to understand which elements are covered by the SaaS provider and which elements require their own controls, testing, documentation, and validation activities.

Customisation Requires a Risk-Based Approach

Business Central provides extensive flexibility through configuration, extensions, workflows, integrations, and bespoke development. For regulated organisations, however, customisation should be supported by a structured, risk-based approach.

The real risk is not customisation itself. It is customisation without an appropriate GAMP 5 risk-based approach behind it.

GAMP 5 provides a framework for applying a risk-based approach to computerised systems. Rather than treating every configuration or change in the same way, organisations can focus validation activities according to the potential impact on product quality, patient safety, data integrity, and regulatory compliance.

This can include areas such as:

  • Data integrity and accuracy
  • User access and permissions
  • Audit trails and traceability
  • Electronic records and approvals
  • Critical business workflows
  • System integrations
  • Custom extensions and code
  • Change control and documentation

Continuous SaaS Updates Change the Validation Lifecycle

One of the major differences between traditional ERP systems and SaaS platforms is the frequency of change.

Business Central evolves continuously through Microsoft’s cloud update cycle. New features, improvements, fixes, and platform changes can potentially affect existing configurations and business processes.

As a result, validation should not be treated as a one-time project. Organisations need a lifecycle approach that considers relevant changes, assesses their potential impact, and determines whether additional testing, documentation, or validation activities are required.

This helps businesses maintain the validated state of their system as the SaaS environment evolves.

Validation and Innovation Can Work Together

For regulated businesses, the challenge is not choosing between innovation and compliance. The focus should be on implementing innovation within a controlled and risk-based framework.

A well-structured validation approach can give organisations greater confidence when adopting new Business Central functionality, introducing integrations, or developing custom solutions.

The key is bringing technical implementation and validation together from the beginning rather than treating CSV as something that happens after development is complete.

How Robosol Supports Business Central Validation

At Robosol, our Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Computer System Validation (CSV) teams work together to support regulated businesses with both customisation and validation.

From configuration and extensions to workflows and bespoke functionality, we consider validation requirements alongside solution design and implementation.

This integrated approach helps businesses maintain appropriate documentation, traceability, risk assessment, testing, and change control while taking advantage of Business Central’s cloud capabilities.

Conclusion

SaaS has changed the way ERP systems are implemented, maintained, and updated—but it has not removed the need for validation.

For regulated organisations, understanding the responsibilities of the SaaS provider, implementation partner, and business is essential. A GAMP 5 risk-based approach can help ensure that configurations, customisations, and ongoing changes are appropriately assessed and controlled.

With the right approach, businesses can continue to customise and innovate with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central while keeping compliance and validation firmly in focus.

At Robosol, we believe compliance and innovation should move together—not against each other.

We at Robosol, with over 20 years of experience & with over a 100 customers across industries can help you in this process. Contact us for an expert consultation to know more.

In this article:
Share on social media:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Telegram